Wednesday, March 12, 2008

What Micro Loans Miss

James Surowiecki writes in the New Yorker:
Businesses that can generate jobs for others are the best hope of any country trying to put a serious dent in its poverty rate. Sustained economic growth requires companies that can make big investments—building a factory, say—and that can exploit the economies of scale that make workers more productive and, ultimately, richer. Microfinance evangelists sometimes make it sound as if, in an ideal world, everyone would own his own business. "All people are entrepreneurs," Muhammad Yunus has said. But in any successful economy most people aren't entrepreneurs—they make a living by working for someone else. Just fourteen per cent of Americans, for instance, are running (or trying to run) their own business. That percentage is much higher in developing countries—in Peru, it's almost forty per cent. That's not because Peruvians are more entrepreneurial. It's because they don't have other options...What poor countries need most, then, is not more microbusinesses. They need more small-to-medium-sized enterprises, the kind that are bigger than a fruit stand but smaller than a Fortune 1000 corporation.

1 comments:

Dan Herman said...

There's no doubt that SME's are what's needed for large scale employment. Getting there is another question. The key to microfinance should be facilitating the expansion of that entrepreneurial spirit into mid-size enterprises. Doing so means means providing more capital, more training and ultimately taking more risk. Is today's world of micro-finance willing to do so? Are the thousands of Kiva donors willing to move the decimal point over a digit? Or is a new model needed: one that bridges what the microfinance and VC worlds currently don't touch - that missing middle...